With Yamaha introducing the MT-09 does anyone think that Triumph will introduce a Street Triple with a Daytona 675 engine in it?
He may be a "professional" rider/reviewer, but in the end it is personal preference on a bike. If consumers like it, they buy it. I personally think it looks cheaply made, but someone else may think it looks like the greatest thing to hit Earth.Interesting to read such positive reviews. While I haven't ridden it yet, I hear that it's pretty bad. Like, not worth it bad...
My source is a professional rider and reviewer.
It was the angle I took the picture from(trying not to put my shadow on it), not the dash itself.That dash looks like its hard to read
It's Yamaha, I doubt it. If it's not the R1/R6 they don't care, the fueling and suspension will still suck. Look how many people are willing to buy a cheap rough finished bike, why would they spend more money in it. As long as the engine has good power people will buy it and continue to praise it, because it is a Triumph knock off.I bet the next years version will fix the suspension![]()
If it's not an exact copy, of a patent-in-force design, they are not infringing. Patents only last a few years, then you can copy. I see it every day - our competitors all do it, we all know the day a patent expires on a desirable product, lol.Maybe Triumph should have patented the 400 lb naked triple. Does the MV infringe on Triumph?
Sent from Motorcycle.com Free App
Yeah, I see it as well in my line of work. That was my attempt at sarcasm. Fail.If it's not an exact copy, of a patent-in-force design, they are not infringing. Patents only last a few years, then you can copy. I see it every day - our competitors all do it, we all know the day a patent expires on a desirable product, lol.