Quality Machine Co.lightened OEM rotors - Triumph675.Net Forums
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 03:24 Thread Starter
nycstripes
Member
 
nycstripes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quality Machine Co.lightened OEM rotors

I just got my OEM rotors back from Jim at Quality Machine Co. He cut the front and rear rotors in a wave pattern for me. Can't mount them up yet, my forks are out for upgrades. Turn around time was just over a week.



Rear Rotor
$77 plus shipping costs
Front Rotors
$87 each plus shipping costs
Tax Included
Shipping Rates
$12 for one
$15 for two
$20 for three
Total Cost was $271 including return shipping for all three rotors.

http://qualitymachineco.com/Form/Order%20Form.pdf
Print out the online form and pack up your rotors and send the rotors to:
Jimmy Chance
Quality Machine Co
600 W Lathrop Ave
Savannah, Ga 31415
912-232-5680 office
http://qualitymachineco.com/

06 Daytona 675 track bike #489
Yoyodyne slipper, Penske double shock, GP Suspension tuned forks, lightned rotors by Quality Machine Co., Sharkskinz race bodywork, GPR Steering Damper, Vortex clip ons, Woodcraft GP rearsets, Giles chain adjusters, 520 chain/gear kit (0/+2), Woodcraft case covers, Pazo shorties, LightTech fuel cap, Tech-Spec, Engine Ice, LeoVince Ti Exhaust, decals by DrippinWet.com

Last edited by nycstripes; 08-05-09 at 10:24.
nycstripes is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 10:35
pal2468
Member
 
pal2468's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 304
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks good, when you decrease the rotor surface area, do you decrease the rotors performance in anyway? Post pics when you get your forks back.

pal2468 is offline  
post #3 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 10:41
Bleakster
Member
 
Bleakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 388
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had my rear rotor done by them. Great service!

The rear rotor lost 11 oz.

I'll post some pics of the rotor on the bike later.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Triumph rear brake rotor.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	118.0 KB
ID:	10372  
Bleakster is offline  
post #4 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 10:48
bean
Member
 
bean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northridge,CA
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to bean
Quote:
Originally Posted by pal2468 View Post
Looks good, when you decrease the rotor surface area, do you decrease the rotors performance in anyway? Post pics when you get your forks back.

+1 does this decrease performance? Is there any advantage braking other than aesthetics?
bean is offline  
post #5 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 11:08
Bleakster
Member
 
Bleakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 388
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In theory one would think that losing rotor surface area would decrease braking performance. Therefore, being unsure about this matter I decided not to do my front rotors. Doing the rear is not as big a deal since you dont use the rear brake all that much anyway. I was more interested in weight savings. Losing 10-11 ounces of rotating mass is like removing 2-3 lbs of total weight off the bike. (Depending on what formula you use.)

Notes:

One thing I did hear about maching out rotors in this fashion is that it tends to increase brake pad wear. (not sure how true this is)

Also, these types of rotors are not legal for some forms of racing.
For instance, AMA does not allow you to manipulate the outside edge of the rotor surface, while CCS does. To be 100% sure always check your rule books.
Bleakster is offline  
post #6 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 11:16
Grady
Senior Member
 
Grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dubbo
Posts: 972
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bean View Post
+1 does this decrease performance? Is there any advantage braking other than aesthetics?
You supposedly end up with a brake setup that will be less prone to fading because the disc has a larger surface area for the heat to radiate away. That is along with the benefits of having less rotational mass. But I am not sure if those benefits are enough to cancel out the loss of some surface area for the pads to bite on. Kawasaki seems to think it works and so offer them on the ZX's, the other manufacturers not so much.

Warning: Death may occur if taken seriously.
Grady is offline  
post #7 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 11:41 Thread Starter
nycstripes
Member
Threadstarter Threadstarter
 
nycstripes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I will post my findings after my next track day later this month. Since I have two sets of rotors, I can afford to play with these and revert back to OEM rotors if I need to. I would imagine that they can't be that much different than the aftermarket wave rotors out there at much less cost.

06 Daytona 675 track bike #489
Yoyodyne slipper, Penske double shock, GP Suspension tuned forks, lightned rotors by Quality Machine Co., Sharkskinz race bodywork, GPR Steering Damper, Vortex clip ons, Woodcraft GP rearsets, Giles chain adjusters, 520 chain/gear kit (0/+2), Woodcraft case covers, Pazo shorties, LightTech fuel cap, Tech-Spec, Engine Ice, LeoVince Ti Exhaust, decals by DrippinWet.com
nycstripes is offline  
post #8 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 12:11
shmike
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boca
Posts: 295
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleakster View Post
Also, these types of rotors are not legal for some forms of racing.
For instance, AMA does not allow you to manipulate the outside edge of the rotor surface, while CCS does. To be 100% sure always check your rule books.
Depends on what class you are running.

CCS does not allow for changing/machining of front rotors in many classes which is why mine aren't done.

The ones posted here look great, though. I should send my rear to them.
shmike is offline  
post #9 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 12:38
morsetaper2
Senior Member
 
morsetaper2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD USA
Posts: 1,884
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
from an engineers perspective...

F=u*N, where...

u=friction coefficient between the pad & rotor, a function of both materials

N=Normal force, AKA the force pushing the rotor and pad surface together, caused by the caliper piston, reduced by any flex in the system

F=Force of friction, AKA the resultant braking force that slows the bike down

Looking at that equation, when the force applied by the caliper goes up, or the friction coefficient is increased, you get more braking force to slow you down.

***************

The Normal force "N", may be substituted by: N=P/A

P=Pressure of the pad material on the rotor surface

A=Area of pad contacting rotor surface

Substituting terms the resulting equation can be written:

F=u*P/A

Reduce the area, the force of friction goes up, equating better stopping power. I think this is a gross oversimplification, I'm reluctant to fully believe in this w/o some hard testing data. What you can be sure of is that more heat per unit volume will end up into the rotor if more braking force "F" is achieved. You also have to have a sufficiently rigid and stiff fork/caliper mount to take advantage of additional braking force gains.

Also, when rotors get hot, they warp, misbehave, braking performance decreases, etc, etc.

In a track situation, the rotors will get used much more severely than your usual street situation. Barring the availability of any hard data, I would look at the SS rotors of the top team(s) that run in a series that allow complete rotor modification to determine the safe, useful, and appropriate level to modify your stock rotors.

But in the end, I think most of you guys would be better served putting your fat ass on a diet!

No Comment!
morsetaper2 is offline  
post #10 of 54 Old 08-05-09, 15:00
Bleakster
Member
 
Bleakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 388
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shmike View Post
Depends on what class you are running.

CCS does not allow for changing/machining of front rotors in many classes which is why mine aren't done.

The ones posted here look great, though. I should send my rear to them.
Thanks for the tip!
Bleakster is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Triumph675.Net Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode


Forum Jump

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome