2013 Daytona 675 Specs - - Page 4 - Triumph675.Net Forums
Home Forum Browse Members Calendar Register Today!  
New Posts Faq / Help? XBOX Live Modifications Classifieds
   
Not A Member Yet? Register today and become part of the community.
Go Back   Triumph675.Net Forums > Daytona 675 & Street Triple 675 Global Forums > News, Announcements, Tests and ride reports

News, Announcements, Tests and ride reports any and all 675 ride experiences and news

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-15-12, 12:30   #31
Knolly
BOTM Winner
 
Knolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,711
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
Default

I don't think the frame sliders are on there stock, it's just that they're offered from the factory. They replace those black pieces that lay on top of the fairings.
__________________
2009 Ninja 250 Track/Race Bike
2009 Triumph Daytona 675 - Sold - My Self-Indulgent Bike Thread
2008 Street Triple - Sold
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-15-12, 12:53   #32
Disrupt
Senior Member
 
Disrupt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 108
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knolly View Post
I don't think the frame sliders are on there stock, it's just that they're offered from the factory. They replace those black pieces that lay on top of the fairings.
I believe your right, it mentions them in the accessories section.
__________________
1993 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4
2007 D675
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-12, 01:35   #33
irzimmer
Member
 
irzimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i'm sorry, i CANNOT TAKE the cyclops eye....unneeded, tacky, conforming to the jap models....and its been a long time since i've seen color schemes that sad, the 2-tone does.not.work. nice little bump on the engine, but really ruined by the aesthetics....i understand the need for a side exhaust, but the front end and the color schemes??? that's the best and brightest at triumph came up with? come on.
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-12, 22:41   #34
NewShockerGuy
BOTM Winner
 
NewShockerGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: FairFax, VA
Posts: 2,322
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Love the engine tweaks and minor performance things... other than that Triumph took a shit on it honestly.

Looks WAY too much like a jap bike now. That stupid single light above the air intake is too much like a gsx-r. The sub frame that used to be awesome looking and hollow now looks clunky and big. Switching to reflector headlights... really triumph?? Pull your head out of your asses.

The side profile of the nose no longer looks pointy and like a dart, it reminds me too much of a big that is round and smooshed up front... I very much dislike the two tone paint scheme. Side exhaust also reminds me too much of a gsx-r.

I'm sorry but I LOVE triumph... I hated the fact that they changed their logo and now that they did this to the Daytona I probably won't buy another one unless I find on sub 08 and lower if something happens to mine... They took the sleekness and the sharpness out of the bike. The sharp angles and lines are now gone. Everything is rounded. Why they did this I honestly don't know but I think it looks like shit. It's sad.

It no longer flows. The wheels I do like, those look nice.

Poor Daytona... :-( Such a beautiful bike and they went and ****ed it up copying everything else on the market and incorporating it into this new one...

-Nigel
__________________
~NSG~


Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-12, 00:41   #35
LIV2
Senior Member
 
LIV2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Euuuuugh

don't remind me about the damn logo!
__________________
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-12, 11:39   #36
Triumph Race Support
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alfreton, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,480
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default

It does look a little better in race trim, but only a little!
Hate the sub-frame. Yes I can confirm the frame sliders are options.
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-12, 17:45   #37
NewShockerGuy
BOTM Winner
 
NewShockerGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: FairFax, VA
Posts: 2,322
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Posting again becaues of my disgust with Triumph. I went and looked for more pictures. It truely is an ugly bike now. I wish someone from Triumph would come on the boards and read this. Simply garbage. All of the cosmetic changes that they made look awful.

F U triumph.

That is all.

-Nigel
__________________
~NSG~


Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-12, 00:52   #38
whip_00
Member
 
whip_00's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: farmington
Posts: 212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewShockerGuy View Post
Posting again becaues of my disgust with Triumph. I went and looked for more pictures. It truely is an ugly bike now. I wish someone from Triumph would come on the boards and read this. Simply garbage. All of the cosmetic changes that they made look awful.

F U triumph.

That is all.

-Nigel
Did you watch the video? I think it looks much better than it does in the still shots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRsS...e_gdata_player

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Motorcycle.com Free App
Status: Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-12, 07:02   #39
jimmytb
Member
 
jimmytb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 377
Thanks: 52
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Of course projector headlights, to match all the other bits they nicked from the 2006 CBR1000RR, cyclops eye, tiny tail, removal of large chunks of fairing, asymmetric swingarm...
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-12, 07:26   #40
Carbon4u
Site Sponsor and BOTM Winner
 
Carbon4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 960
Thanks: 19
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

We went to the NEC bike show yesterday and saw 3 in the flesh.
The 675R and the others were in standard trim, they looked very boring and "jap" looking..
No "Triumph" on the front, just a big hole for the air intake , the front looked very R6 and just another bike to us..

The others looked the same and the white and blue looked the best, just on colour..
While there 99% people said they hated it, and gave the feedback to the Triumph staff on the stand.. But do they care ?

The ST & R looked better than the Daytona, but still again they have the plain standard versions..

Cant wait to see a modded version of both.. But a shame on the Daytona, it just another bike now..
Status: Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump





Forum SEO by Zoints
Copyright 2009 TRIUMPH675.NET Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Honda Grom Forum Harley Davidson Forum Honda 600RR Kawasaki Forum Yamaha R6 Forum Yamaha FZ-09 Forum
1199 Panigale Forum Roadglide Forum Honda CBR1000 Forum Vulcan Forum Yamaha R1 Forum Yamaha R3 Forum
Ducati Monster Forum Harley Forums Honda CBR250R Forum ZX10R Forum Star Raider Forum Yamaha Viking Forum
Suzuki GSXR Forum V-Rod Forums Honda Shadow Forum Kawasaki Motorcycle Forum Star Warrior Forum KTM Duke 390 Forum
SV650 Forum BMW S1000RR Forum Honda Fury Forum Kawasaki Versys Forum Drag Racing Forum Ducati 899 Panigale Forum
Suzuki V-Strom BMW K1600 Triumph Forum Victory Forums Sportbikes BMW NineT Forum
Volusia Forum BMW F800 Forum Triumph 675 Forum MV Agusta Forum HD Street Forum Suzuki GW250 Forum
Yamaha Motorcycles Victory Gunner Forum Honda Vultus Forum HD LiveWire Forum Ninja H2 Forum Ducati Scrambler Forum