|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
| Not A Member Yet? Register today and become part of the community. |
|
| |||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
10-31-12, 17:14
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 209
|
Sprocket question
Hey, are there any swingarm / chain guide interference issues with running a setup like 14/42 or 14/43? I've searched around and no one is really doing it on this bike but it doesn't seem at first glance that there would be interference issues.
Thanks.
__________________
06 675 w/ 2009 engine running on 2006 electronics |
|
Status: Offline
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
10-31-12, 18:25
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,035
|
What's the reason for dropping down to a 14/42?
|
|
Status: Offline
|
|
|
11-01-12, 00:36
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 7,654
|
14/42 = .33
16/47 = .34 (stock) The gearing change is insignificant and would be hardly noticeable. Top speed would be a little more then -3mph from stock. It might be useful however if you are trying to change the chain angle or relative position in relation to the swingarm and thus drive out of corners. |
|
Status: Offline
|
|
|
11-01-12, 02:04
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dirty South
Posts: 829
|
Maybe a 15/44 would be a good medium. It's what I usually run on my bike. No clearance issues thus far.
__________________
 www.HazardousRacing.com Custom suits for as low as $749 (licensed racers $649) BUT there is a GROUP BUY in the works! Email me with ANY questions: Micah@HazardousRacing.com (put 675.net in the subject field)... or PM me on here. |
|
Status: Offline
|
|
|
11-04-12, 15:39
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 914
|
I take it you're going for reduction of rotational mass?
|
|
Status: Offline
|
|
|
11-04-12, 16:49
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 915
|
Either that or the theory that there is less waste in a slower turning chain. I'd guess you would get some serious rubbage on the chain guide.
__________________
09 Street Triple 06 Track Triple |
|
Status: Offline
|
|
|
11-05-12, 14:36
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
__________________
06 675 w/ 2009 engine running on 2006 electronics |
|
|
Status: Offline
|
|
|
11-07-12, 22:12
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: On the box!!
Posts: 669
|
You'd have to run a shorter chain...16/45 was the smallest I could run on stock # of links/swing arm length....
__________________
CCS #159 MWSS, MWSB National Champ!! GTU, MWSS, MWSB, HWSS Regional Champ!! 
|
|
Status: Offline
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|||||
Linear Mode
